Beware of These Strong Buys

It's an understatement to say that investors are excited by the opportunities in green tech.

John Doerr, one of the world's most successful venture capitalists, called cleantech the "biggest economic opportunity of this century." One of the best-performing stocks of 2007 was none other than First Solar, up an incredible 795%. And recent data from the Cleantech Group (as reported by CNET News) showed that VC investment in green tech increased 44% in 2007 -- from $3.6 billion to nearly $5.2 billion.

Triple back-up-the-truck booyah, right?

Not so fast
A centerpiece of the recent Roth Capital investment conference in California was an "Investing in Green Tech" expert panel. Its goal was to reveal how to make obscene profits by investing in green tech stocks.

But it did the exact opposite.

As the panel went on, it became clear that even these experts -- people who now devote their careers to advancing green technologies -- weren't quite sure what the perfect green tech policy, incentive, initiative, or technology looked like. But who could blame them?

Wrap your head around this ...
First, there's significant government involvement in the sector that distorts market forces. That's an immediate red flag for prospective investors. Whenever the government is involved in something, there can be no certainty.

Second, green tech development cycles are becoming increasingly rapid. What seems like a great idea today could be obsolete tomorrow. For an investor in an early-stage company, your product may never get to market -- leaving you staring down a significant risk of total capital loss.

Finally, we still haven't decided what the goal of green tech is. Is it to increase efficiency and reduce demand? If that happens, energy prices will drop, and consumption will just rise again. Is it to build cleaner generation and consumption technologies? Unfortunately, every alternative solution has a shortcoming. Wind, for example, tends not to blow during hot days, when demand is highest. And windmills aren't always welcome additions to a community's skyline.

Buyer beware
Yet investors continue to throw money at the sector, and they remain optimistic about current investment opportunities. Just look at the analyst ratings for a few well-known green tech stocks:

Company

Buy
Recommendations

Sell
Recommendations

First Solar

20

1

Suntech Power

23

0

SunPower

25

1

American Superconductor (Nasdaq: AMSC)

6

1

Ener1 (AMEX: HEV)

1

0

Itron (Nasdaq: ITRI)

7

0

Quantum Fuel Systems (Nasdaq: QTWW)

2

0

Spire (Nasdaq: SPIR)

2

0

Gushan Environmental Energy (NYSE: GU)

5

0

That overwhelmingly positive analyst sentiment could entice you to enter the sector. This comment from Lisa Bicker of CleanTech San Diego, however, might send you running in the other direction: "The capital markets for these types of investments are very frothy right now, yet there are few productive investments available."

A case study
What happens when frothy markets meet a lack of productive investments? Take a look at ethanol stocks over the past two years. It was once thought that ethanol could make the U.S. both greener and more energy-independent, but recent research has revealed that ethanol production could offset or, even worse, outweigh the greenhouse gas reductions caused by its use. What's more, the combination of rising corn prices and farmers growing more corn and less of everything else has led to higher food prices across the board.

Of course, demand for ethanol wasn't necessarily stoked by market forces. The government, the politicians who coveted the Iowa primary, and several powerful interest groups were very much involved in making ethanol a green tech priority.

All of this combined to make ethanol stocks a very bad investment when they were touted in spring 2006. For example, on April 5, 2006, analyst Michael Brush wrote about a few "ethanol stocks to get revved up about." Here's how those picks have performed since his article was published:

Company

Return since
4/5/06

Green Plains Renewable Energy

-81%

Pacific Ethanol

-92%

Archer Daniels Midland

-17%

MGP Ingredients

-66%

Another high-profile ethanol play, VeraSun Energy, IPO'd in June of that year at $25 per share. It now trades for around $7.

I am not against saving the world
Energy companies pursuing green solutions are not bad or misguided. The world is clearly seeking cleaner energy sources, even as the demand for energy around the world rises.

Still, investors can turn even the best company into a bad buy by paying the wrong price. That's a real risk in the green tech sector, where outcomes are uncertain and valuations are "frothy."

If you do it, do it right
Nonetheless, there is a wide market opportunity for green tech companies today -- and a wide market opportunity is a core trait we look for in the small companies we recommend to investors in our Motley Fool Hidden Gems service. So while we're somewhat wary of the sector, we're also taking a long, hard look at it.

Governing that research are a few tips from those Roth Conference panelists:

  • Focus on green initiatives that offer customers immediate return on investment. They're most likely to be adopted.
  • Pay attention to the large utilities that will make many spending choices going forward. They will be extremely interested in distributed generation, energy storage, and advanced metering technologies, because peak demand for electricity is an enormous challenge.
  • Watch hybrid vehicles; they have real consumer appeal, and they're one of the few ways individuals can participate tangibly in emissions reduction.
  • Do not overpay.

So while we're looking hard at green tech at Motley Fool Hidden Gems, we won't recommend any stock at the expense of a compelling valuation. When it comes to buying green tech stocks, you should do the same.

After all, that focus on valuation in the small-cap space has our picks 20 percentage points ahead of the market. You can check out what we recommend today, and read all of our notes from the Roth Conference, by joining Hidden Gems free for 30 days. There's no obligation to subscribe.

This article was first published March 7, 2008. It has been updated.

Tim Hanson does not own shares of any company mentioned. As a vigilant steward of the environment, he skateboards to work, uses reusable bags at the grocery store, and pushes the limits of his wife's tolerance for heat when it comes to managing the air conditioner at home. Suntech Power is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. The Fool's disclosure policy doesn't require that Tim tell you all of that, but you can read about what is required here.

Comment (4)
Recommended (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • On July 24, 2008, at 11:55 PM, curtbs wrote: Report this Comment

    I lost all respect for you fools,a one sided story,are ya short solar...well its going up along with hydrogen plays.

  • On July 27, 2008, at 3:44 PM, danielgullo wrote: Report this Comment

    Before I get up on the pulpit regarding the ethanol message I am about to lay on you, let me first say that I own quite a bit of stock in the company I will mention. The CEO is also my uncle and I have worked for the company on and off for about 25 years. However, ultimately, I would encourage everyone to do the research about this and decide for themselves. The message is more about the process.

    The cautious sentiment regarding ethanol seems to be that it is a fantastic technology with a great deal of promise and potential for reducing some of the impact of traditional fuel sorces; but is undermined by the fact that the production relies upon feed stocks such as corn and sugarcane to manufacture the product. Enter BlueFire Ethanol (BFRE).

    BlueFire Ethanol is the sole holder of all patents related to the production of ethanol from garbage. Let me say that again "production of ethanol from garbage." The plants are designed to be co-located next to land-fills for numerous reasons.

    First, the technology itself is based upon the use of cellulostic garbage as the "feed stock" for the process.

    Second, who in their right mind is going to say "We don't mind having a landfill in our backyard, but by God, don't try to build an ethanol plant that will transform some of that garbage into useful materials."

    Third, though most of the bi-products of the process are targetted for sale (gypsum for sheetrock, fibrous materials for mulch, gases for use in providing energy to the plant) the remaining waste complies with regulations in terms of depositing at the landfill.

    Not a drop of ethanol has been produced by BlueFire in the United States, which may seem to echo the point in this article about the technology being unproven. However, the Izumi prototype plant in Japan has been online since 2002. BlueFire has won considerable grants from the Fed and California. All permits have been cleared and ground will be broken in August on the first US plant.

    This technolgoy is the real deal when it comes to ethanol production.

  • On July 30, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Jdelaney634 wrote: Report this Comment

    The Fool has been anti alternative energy for a while. For guys that pride themselves on research they should have taken a better look at Spire. Solar is the main part of their business...but they have been around since the 70's and have 2 other lines of business to drive R&D. Their balance sheet is in great shape and they consistantly improve margins. Ethenol in the US is a tough road for sure, since corn ethenol makes little sense unless you can leap frog stages of production...Novozymes anyone? Fools please get a successful green analyst on your payroll so we can have a balanced story just once? Thanks.

  • On July 31, 2008, at 12:59 PM, sylphe wrote: Report this Comment

    Speaking as a seasoned stock analyst, I am in broad agreement with the article: whether they call themselves "greentech," "alternative energy" or just plain "green," the majority of companies involved are only taking advantage of a fad and few, if any, have products or technologies that are economically viable or could become so any time soon. One needs not be a rocket scientist to understand this and I believe that stock analysts who issue Buy recommendations on most such stocks are incompetent or dishonest, or both.

Add your comment.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 692429, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 10/13/2008 11:18:23 PM,

Related Tickers

American Superconductor Corp

AMSC Up! $16.23 +3.22 (+24.75%) 4:00 PM
CAPS Rating:
457 Outperforms
104 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 5001,003.35+11.58%
DJIA9,387.61+11.08%
NASD1,844.25+11.81%
Updated: 4:05:51 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

What do you think will be the best performing sector over the next six months?

Sponsored by: